Refutation: Six Easy Ways to Attack or Refute an Argument
Refutation is not
mainly about your standpoint, but rather about the other person’s point of
view, and why it is incorrect.
In
a refutation, first, give a very brief but honest summary of the opposing argument. Then, you show why that argument is wrong,
mistaken, or should not be accepted or believed.
Refutation is a crucial part
of adult-level discourse! Show why opposing arguments are:
|
-
unclear
(jumbled,
disorganized, confused, obscure, contradicts itself, impossible for an
intelligent person to understand, full of holes, leaves too many
questions unanswered, uses too many obscure or undefined words, too
general, too badly mixed up to make any sense, or presented in language or
style that readers cannot understand);
-
incredible
(unbelievable, incoherent, beyond credibility, a flat-out lie or
deception, strains the audience’s suspension of disbelief, offers no
reasons to believe the opponent’s statements, gives no solid sources for
unusual or extraordinary claims, relies on questionable, outdated or
biased sources, relies on personal stories instead of objective
evidence, or relies on evidence that is missing or cannot be produced or
reproduced);
-
impossible
(not anchored in the real world, a proposal that is not possible to
accomplish, a fantasy masquerading as reality, strains the reader’s
imagination, is silly or preposterous, ignores the laws of nature, turns
the world on its head, requires a miracle or an act of God to come true,
or
is a million-to-one long shot)
-
illogical
(not standing up to the test of logic, paranoid, not an intelligent
argument, jumps to conclusions, includes gross logical
fallacies, is ignorant, uneducated, childish or infantile, lacks
necesary
evidence or proof for statements or claims, is closed-minded, is
ideologically driven, or conveniently ignores the facts);
-
unfitting
(coarse or boorish, simply not right or moral in a civilized society,
evil-minded, unworthy of decent people, immature, vicious or hateful,
racist, sexist or discriminatory, or culturally unacceptable, disagrees
with your own faith or morals, is inhumane, is written in bad faith
[i.e., even the writer does not believe it], conveniently ignores the
fate of certain groups of people, is self-centered); or
-
unprofitable
(makes no sense financially or money-wise, is wasteful, will cost more
than it saves, throws good money after bad, robs Peter to pay Paul, is a
zero- [or negative] sum game, throws money at the problem instead of
solving the causes, will result in poverty, bankruptcy or starvation,
will enrich the few at the cost of the many, will trade short-term gain
for long term disaster, or will ruin the environment).
(Reference:
http://humanities.byu.edu/rhetoric/Pedagogy/Progymnasmata/Refutation.htm)
Hint: As with
any other argument, you can refute with logos, pathos or ethos, or any
combination of these!
O.W. 11/05 rev 1/10
NOTE: When writing a
refutation, write as an educated adult when addressing your intended
audience. As a beginning scholar, if you write that an argument is
illogical, crazy, or impossible to understand but many other people (perhaps
other discourse communities) think
that it is important and great, readers will probably not agree with
you, but they may conclude instead that you are too immature
or uneducated to comprehend what important arguments your opponents are
offering
against your standpoint. Instead, choose other ways to refute, ways that
your intended audience will more likely accept.
|
|