Score |
5 or 4 |
3 or 2 |
1 or 0 |
|
Ideas and Content |
- Information is accurate and current
- Ideas come mainly from primary sources
- Developer shows knowledge and insight
- Effective use of technology demonstrated
- All information relates to the overall purpose
|
- Information not always clear
- Primary source use is not always clear
- Content connections not always clear
- Does not relate content to larger context
- No way to check validity of information
- Strong purpose not demonstrated
|
- Information incomplete or inaccurate
- Information not from primary sources
- Little or no overall context for information
- Value of information is unclear
- No way to check validity of information
- Lacks sense of purpose or central theme
|
|
Comments:
|
Score |
5 or 4 |
3 or 2 |
1 or 0 |
|
Educational Components
|
- Utilizes inquiry in an effective manner
- Integrates problem solving and critical thinking skills
- Utilizes real world focus
- Follows the 5-step organizational framework
|
- Utilizes inquiry in some aspects
- Integrates some pedagogical techniques
- Integrates some real world issues
- Uses some of the 5-step organizational framework
|
- Does not use inquiry
- Presents material in rote manners
- Has no connection to real world events
- Does not follow the 5-step organizational framework
|
|
Comments:
|
Score |
5 or 4 |
3 or 2 |
1 or 0 |
|
Presentation |
- Web site is clearly identified; easy to find
- The layout is clear and easy to follow
- Backgrounds and text work well together
- Graphical elements are used consistently
- Multimedia adds to the main purpose
- Links are appropriate
|
- Web site easy to find
- Layout of most pages is easy to follow
- Backgrounds are text were not effective
- Inconsistent or inappropriate graphics
- Multimedia sometimes doesn't add
- Use of links is unclear
|
- Web site hard to find
- Layout is confusing or inappropriate
- Backgrounds and text not effective
- Graphics only decorative or confusing
- Multimedia unrelated to the topic
- Too many unrelated links, or too few links
|
|
Comments:
|
Score |
5 or 4 |
3 or 2 |
1 or 0 |
|
Technical |
- Links work properly
- Graphics are optimized
- Works in all browsers including Netscape and Internet
Explorer
- Includes relevant Meta data
- Multimedia resources work properly
|
- Not all links work properly
- Graphics are generally optimized
- Pages don't work in all browsers
- Relevant Meta data could be improved
- Multimedia resources work most of the time
|
- Links don't work properly
- Graphic elements not optimized
- Specific browsers needed to make it work
- Relevant Meta data is not included
- Resources fail to work
|
|
Comments:
|
Score |
5 or 4 |
3 or 2 |
1 or 0 |
|
Organization |
- Inviting opening page draws the visitor inside
- Details are logical and effective
- Layout of pages provides good direction
- How to explore an idea is clear
- Each page begins with a clear transition
- Easy to navigate through the pages
|
- Inconsistent structure of pages
- Sequencing is inconsistent
- Some pages incomplete
- Some links disjointed; lack purpose
- Unclear connections among sections
- Sense of being lost or unsure navigating
|
- No orientation for visitors
- Sequencing unclear
- Pages lack closure
- No focus for links
- Pages are inconsistent
- Difficult to navigate in an organized way
|
|
Comments:
|
Final Score |
|
|
|
|
Final Comments:
|